What Do You Think?
The end of the season brings a chance to reflect on opportunities for improvement, although fortunately it seems that none is critical at this stage of GDHL's evolution. Let the committee know what you think about the points below. (You can just reply to this email.)
We've not had much fuss lately about bib allocations. Several years ago, we moved away from placing all older males in a preferred spot and now allocate men's bibs based on weighting age 1/3 and performance 2/3, but switching to 50/50 at age 60. (Women are ranked in the same way, but we group them together a bit more, as they seem to thrive in clusters.) For reference, Jeff Sutherland will turn 60 for next season, so he will get a small bump towards the front of the line despite his continuing fine performances. Based on the past season's list, Jeff would move from 82 to 73. Allan LaChance has been in the 60+ adjustment regime for a while. This past season he was bib 62 instead of bib 75 as a result.
Some have suggested that ski-cross racers got it right by not allowing alpine-style race suits. Certainly pre-race ablutions etc. would be facilitated, although Cynthia Waite's fine pink and white suit would be missed. Ski-cross apparently has a rule about minimum loose fabric measurements, which sounds like a sexual harassment lawsuit in waiting for GDHL inspectors, so I would be inclined to simply stipulate that the fabric content has to be less than 10% Lycra, and if you split your pants during a race you're disqualified.
The past season's scheduling led to slalom being overweighted at the outset, although we were able to restore the traditional mix of three GS, three SL and one Super G with two GS on the final day. It's been suggested that we should perhaps switch to four GS and two SL. Supporting arguments include straighter, simpler races being safer and GS being easier to grasp and less intimidating for newcomers. Conversely, some prefer slightly slower races, and SL seems to give women a better chance of beating men.
Although there has been little fuss about bib allocations, there is no shortage of inquiries about scoring adjustments for those who are injured or appear in hindsight not to have been properly ranked. I'm sure this is all in an altruistic spirit of justice for all, coupled only coincidentally with the positive effect on one's own team's ranking. I had one such inquiry from a racer who seemed unaware of his team already being in first place despite an injured member who had missed all of the races to date. I believe my answer has uniformly been that the Calcutta is gambling (shocking I know) and you take your chances when you pay your money. Your committee is not keen on the prospect of weighing the merits of the excuses for non-attendance that racers would inevitably propose. Having said that, it has occurred to me (often when adjustments leave a low ranked racer who has missed all races to date with a negative score) that the adjustment system favours higher ranked racers. (If you don't have four races, you get your average score minus 10 points for each missing race. If you have no races, you get points based on your ranking, assuming everyone showed up, minus 10 points per race, which would leave you with something like minus 36 if you were the lowest ranked racer and missed all races.) We could instead make the adjustment say 10% of your average score, and if you have no races give you a score based on the score of the person who is in your ranking spot, less 10%.
So, let the committee know if you have a strong view about:
- bib allocation rules
- not allowing speed suits (except maybe in the Super G)
- having fewer SL races
- adjusting the penalties for those who don't complete four races
And of course, if you just feel strongly about keeping GDHL a great place to race, please volunteer to join the committee. Skill testing question is "who are you" and 75% accuracy is required - we have standards!
Observations
I was surprised and delighted to be given a lifetime achievement award at the GDHL dinner.